LISTSERV - ATEG Archives - LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

ATEG Archives

February 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	ATEG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:

Subject	From	Date
Re: But as a preposition?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:40:18 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	Peter Adams	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:18:22 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:16:51 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	Nancy Tuten	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:11:47 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:43:21 -0500
Re: Categories for rules (was Nancy's rules; "But" as a preposition)	Nancy Tuten	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:52:35 -0500
Re: Categories for rules (was Nancy's rules; "But" as a preposition)	Linda Comerford	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:33:23 -0500
Re: Categories for rules (was Nancy's rules; "But" as a preposition)	Linda Di Desidero	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:29:42 -0500
Re: Categories for rules (was Nancy's rules; "But" as a preposition)	Linda Comerford	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:38:16 -0500
Re: Categories for rules (was Nancy's rules; "But" as a preposition)	Spruiell, William C	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:23:49 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	Nancy Tuten	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:53:29 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:27:16 -0500
Re: On "usefulness" in studying language	Craig Hancock	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:16:02 -0500
Categories for rules (was Nancy's rules; "But" as a preposition)	Nancy Tuten	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:11:31 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Craig Hancock	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:51:37 -0500
On "usefulness" in studying language	Robert Yates	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:57:41 -0600
Re: But as a preposition?	Bruce Despain	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:50:27 -0700
Re: Prince Harry's Deployment	Bruce Despain	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:42:36 -0700
Re: But as a preposition?	Bruce Despain	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:29:02 -0700
Re: Nancy's rules ? But as a preposition?	Linda Di Desidero	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:41:42 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	Nancy Tuten	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:19:12 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:13:31 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	Peter Adams	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:49:36 -0500
Prince Harry's Deployment	Brad Johnston	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:36:01 -0800
Re: But as a preposition?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:13:03 -0500
Re: But as a preposition?	Nancy Tuten	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:02:08 -0500
But as a preposition?	Peter Adams	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:33:41 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:27:23 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 26 Feb 2008 to 27 Feb 2008 (#2008-51)	Scott	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:18:09 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Bruce Despain	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:21:30 -0700
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:08:11 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:42:44 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Bruce Despain	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:40:46 -0700
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Craig Hancock	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:02:25 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Bruce Despain	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:54:03 -0700
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Craig Hancock	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:51:22 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Bruce D. Despain	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:32:22 -0700
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation	Edmond Wright	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:41:36 +0000
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:38:53 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:28:34 -0500
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences	Bruce Despain	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:42:08 -0700
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences	Craig Hancock	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:18:33 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Linda Di Desidero	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:04:57 -0500
Right- and left-branching sentences	Edmond Wright	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:16:58 +0000
Re: graphic display of text syntax for comprehensibility	Kevin Dwyer	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:08:57 -0500
Re: graphic display of text syntax for comprehensibility	Don Stewart	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:11:14 -0500
Re: graphic display of text syntax for comprehensibility	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:21:38 -0500
Re: graphic display of text syntax for comprehensibility	Peter Adams	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:43:57 -0500
Re: graphic display of text syntax for comprehensibility	Kimberley Hunt	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:38:07 -0600
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Carol Morrison	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:24:59 -0800
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Craig Hancock	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:45:40 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Johanna Rubba	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:29:07 -0800
graphic display of text syntax for comprehensibility	Scott Woods	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:22:07 -0800
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Spruiell, William C	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:21:28 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Craig Hancock	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:42:05 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Geoffrey Layton	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:24:38 -0600
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:48:14 -0500
The West Indies Hat Seller (two photos)	Brad Johnston	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:05:20 -0800
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Nancy Tuten	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:02:32 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Carol Morrison	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:32:09 -0800
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Spruiell, William C	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:37:48 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Johanna Rubba	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:54:01 -0800
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Bruce Despain	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:58:22 -0700
Re: Form and function	Craig Hancock	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:12:30 -0500
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Robert Yates	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:01:38 -0600
Re: Form and function (philosophy of language)	Bruce Despain	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:31:24 -0700
Re: Form and function	Robert Yates	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:21:48 -0600
Re: Form and function	Bruce D. Despain	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:51:10 -0700
Re: Form and function	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:18:59 -0500
Re: Form vs. function; ATEG Digest - 21 Feb 2008 to 22 Feb 2008 (#2008-46)	Scott	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:05:08 -0500
Re: Form and function	Robert Yates	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:16:14 -0600
Form and Function	Edmond Wright	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:00:09 +0000
Re: Form and function	Bruce D. Despain	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:39:05 -0700
Re: Form and function	Carol Morrison	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:01:18 -0800
Form and function	Edmond Wright	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:49:04 +0000
Re: Form and function	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:25:50 -0500
Re: Form and function	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:12:42 -0500
Re: Form and function	Craig Hancock	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:34:52 -0500
Form and function	Edmond Wright	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:04:39 +0000
Re: Adverb?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:08:37 -0500
Re: Adverb?	Johanna Rubba	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:57:31 -0800
Re: Adverb?	Craig Hancock	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:55:33 -0500
Re: Adverb?	Peter Adams	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:56:32 -0500
Re: Obama vs. Clinton	Paul E. Doniger	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:54:51 -0800
Re: Adverb?	Peter Adams	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:50:39 -0500
Re: Adverb?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:47:51 -0500
Re: Emergency Memory Loss Help	Johanna Rubba	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:27:48 -0800
Re: Adverb?	Johanna Rubba	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:22:27 -0800
Re: Emergency Memory Loss Help	Paul T. Wilson	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:18:36 -0500
Re: NYTimes opinion piece on semicolons	Linda Comerford	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:11:44 -0500
Re: NYTimes opinion piece on semicolons	Johanna Rubba	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:09:51 -0800
Re: Adverb?	Bruce Despain	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:49:18 -0700
Re: NYTimes opinion piece on semicolons	Larry Beason	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:47:09 -0600
Re: Adverb?	Peter Adams	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:38:02 -0500
Re: Obama vs. Clinton	Robert Yates	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:28:14 -0600
Re: Emergency Memory Loss Help - CANCEL (sort of)	Geoffrey Layton	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:11:45 -0600
Re: Obama vs. Clinton	Craig Hancock	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:10:09 -0500
Obama vs. Clinton	Carol Morrison	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:19:59 -0800
Emergency Memory Loss Help	Geoffrey Layton	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:13:38 -0600
my apology	rbetting	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:56:42 -0600
Re: Form and function	Edmond Wright	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:51:13 +0000
Meaning of Plausible	John Crow	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:09:49 -0500
Re: possessive adjective/determiner/pronoun	Cynthia Baird	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:09:09 -0800
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED	rbetting	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:19:23 -0600
Re: Adverb?	Craig Hancock	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:12:13 -0500
Re: NYTimes opinion piece on semicolons	Carol Morrison	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:53:09 -0800
NYTimes opinion piece on semicolons	Spruiell, William C	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:22:38 -0500
Re: Form and function	Spruiell, William C	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:30:21 -0500
Re: Adverb?	Bruce Despain	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:05:16 -0700
Re: Adverb?	Geoffrey Layton	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:43:57 -0600
Re: Adverb?	Veit, Richard	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:49:59 -0500
Re: Adverb?	Craig Hancock	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:45:56 -0500
Re: Adverb?	Bruce Despain	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:25:46 -0700
Re: Adverb?	Craig Hancock	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:41:46 -0500
Re: Adverb?	Bruce Despain	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:02:33 -0700
Repeating the fifth grade	Bruce Despain	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:28:14 -0700
Repeating the fifth grade (one photo)	Brad Johnston	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:38:32 -0800
Re: Form and function	Craig Hancock	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:19:31 -0500
Form and function	Edmond Wright	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:57:10 +0000
Adverb?	Castilleja, Janet	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:27:14 -0800
Re: possessive adjective/determiner/pronoun	Spruiell, William C	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:53:30 -0500
Re: possessive adjective/determiner/pronoun	Spruiell, William C	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:36:37 -0500
Re: possessive adjective/determiner/pronoun	Johanna Rubba	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:29:57 -0800
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED--correction	Hadley, Tim	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:15:40 -0600
possessive adjective/determiner/pronoun	Scott Woods	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:01:38 -0800
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Cynthia Baird	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:35:32 -0800
Voltaire & the past perfect	Brad Johnston	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:35:52 -0800
Re: Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:01:59 -0500
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED	Edmond Wright	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:54:05 +0000
Re: Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	Geoffrey Layton	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:53:08 -0600
Re: Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	Veit, Richard	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:41:10 -0500
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	DD Farms	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:22:22 -0600
Re: No one hyphenates?	Carol Morrison	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:44:37 -0800
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED	Anthony DeFazio	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:35:51 EST
No one hyphenates?	Spruiell, William C	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:01:49 -0500
BOOK REVIEW NEEDED	Myers, Marshall	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:48:50 -0500
Re: Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:01:09 -0500
Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	Brad Johnston	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:51:53 -0800
Re: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama	Don Stewart	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:53:20 -0500
Re: some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	Craig Hancock	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:09:03 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	Craig Hancock	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:44:54 -0500
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Robert Yates	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:32:55 -0600
Re: some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:30:02 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:15:10 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:55:24 -0500
Re: Great writers versus the prescriptivists (was Past perfect phrases, E.B. White)	Paul E. Doniger	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:41:11 -0800
Re: Passion & the past perfect	O'Sullivan, Brian P	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:25:05 -0500
Passion & the past perfect	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:58:45 -0800
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:38:10 -0800
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	O'Sullivan, Brian P	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:21:33 -0500
some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:20:38 -0800
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:04:07 -0500
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:54:20 -0500
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:52:15 -0800
Re: The Audacity of Barack Obama	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:41:40 -0500
The Audacity of Barack Obama	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:19:21 -0800
Re: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama	Nancy Tuten	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:11:49 -0500
Johanna & Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:05:34 -0800
Re: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama	Veit, Richard	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:22:37 -0500
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Johanna Rubba	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:27:40 -0800
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Spruiell, William C	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:27:38 -0500
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:01:44 -0500
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Edgar Schuster	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:26:26 EST
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Paul E. Doniger	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:54:20 -0800
Re: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama	Gregg Heacock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:52:51 -0800
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:30:58 -0500
The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:34:53 -0800
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Linda Di Desidero	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:49:25 -0500
Re: E.B. White & the past perfect	Scott Woods	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:35:54 -0800
E.B. White & the past perfect	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:08:09 -0800
Re: Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Geoffrey Layton	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:30:50 -0600
Re: Hancock - the past perfect makes a difference	Carol Morrison	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:12:52 -0800
Past perfect phrases, E.B. White	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:00:20 -0500
Hancock - the past perfect makes a difference	Brad Johnston	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:56:33 -0800
Re: Context matters - continued	Craig Hancock	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:25:25 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Beth Young	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:35:58 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Beth Young	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:22:51 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Nancy Tuten	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:01:00 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:46:45 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:23:32 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Beth Young	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:11:32 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:10:41 -0500
Re: Was Bush president?	Craig Hancock	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:39:29 -0500
Re: The use of "that" ; long rant	Scott	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:48:42 -0500
Re: Was Bush president?	Paul E. Doniger	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:07:52 -0800
Was Bush president?	Brad Johnston	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:31:01 -0800
Re the Addition to George Bush	Brad Johnston	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:20:58 -0800
Re: Addition to George Bush	Nancy Tuten	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:32:24 -0500
Re: Addition to George Bush	Nancy Tuten	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:04:17 -0500
Addition to George Bush	Brad Johnston	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:02:34 -0800
George Bush	Brad Johnston	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:40:26 -0800
Re: Context matters - continued	Craig Hancock	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:18:14 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:39:15 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:33:59 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	DD Farms	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:04:21 -0600
Re: Context matters - continued	Craig Hancock	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:56:35 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	Craig Hancock	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:54:50 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	Johanna Rubba	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:44:18 -0800
Re: Use of 'that'	Johanna Rubba	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:38:40 -0800
Re: Context matters - continued	Craig Hancock	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:21:30 -0500
Re: Context matters - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:07:10 -0500
Use of 'that'	Edmond Wright	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:00:56 +0000
Re: The use of "that"	DD Farms	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:03:22 -0600
The use of "that"	Brad Johnston	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:12:02 -0800
Context matters - continued	Brad Johnston	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:01:02 -0800
Re: The use of "that"	Nancy Tuten	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:29:02 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:34:50 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	Peter Adams	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:52:08 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:05:51 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	Nancy Tuten	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:36:03 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:55:18 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:51:59 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	Johanna Rubba	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:26:47 -0800
Re: May and might	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:54:29 -0500
Re: May and might	Jane Saral	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:05:52 -0500
Re: May and might	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:54:13 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:27:36 -0500
Re: May and might	Carole Hurlbut	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:23:53 -0600
Re: May and might	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:17:41 -0500
Re: Text without context	Carol Morrison	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:00:16 -0800
May and might	Jane Saral	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:59:35 -0500
Text without context	Carol Morrison	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:51:04 -0800
Re: The use of "that"	Nancy Tuten	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:39:20 -0500
Re: The use of "that"	Nancy Tuten	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:32:35 -0500
The use of "that"	Brad Johnston	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:14:49 -0800
A Farewell to Arms?	Brad Johnston	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:06:01 -0800
The use of "that"	Carol Morrison	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:38:50 -0800
It is not a trivial matter	Brad Johnston	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:32:37 -0800
Re: Layton - so it makes no difference?	DD Farms	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:22:54 -0600
Re: Exclamatory sentences	Spruiell, William C	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:25:26 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 9 Feb 2008 to 10 Feb 2008 (#2008-31)	Spruiell, William C	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:25:10 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 9 Feb 2008 to 10 Feb 2008 (#2008-31)	DD Farms	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:31:39 -0600
Re: Layton - so it makes no difference?	Spruiell, William C	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:08:29 -0500
Re: Grammarian's Valentine	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:25:16 -0500
Re: Grammarian's Valentine	DD Farms	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:17:17 -0600
Re: Exclamatory sentences	Jean Waldman	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:40:59 -0500
Re: Layton - so it makes no difference?	Cynthia Baird	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:46:21 -0800
Re: Layton - so it makes no difference?	Craig Hancock	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:05:26 -0500
Learning English from a Chinese professor	Brad Johnston	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:26:50 -0800
Layton - so it makes no difference?	Brad Johnston	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:08:45 -0800
Re: Brad's Grammar Survey - "Life's Lesson"	Geoffrey Layton	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:47:31 -0600
Re: Topics for discussion	Geoffrey Layton	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:25:22 -0600
Re: Brad's Grammar Survey - continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:25:07 -0500
Re: pronunciation of "been"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:07:34 -0500
Learning English from a Chinese professor--was Brad's survey	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:58:15 -0500
Brad's Grammar Survey - continued	Brad Johnston	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:19:59 -0800
What a great opportunity to look at language	Brad Johnston	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:05:22 -0800
Re: Grammarian's Valentine	Craig Hancock	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:50:08 -0500
Re: Exclamatory sentences	Scott Woods	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:19:31 -0800
Re: Topics for discussion	Carol Morrison	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:05:20 -0800
Jane Mairs - out of the office	Jane Mairs	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:26:34 -0500
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Cynthia Baird	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:23:51 -0800
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Cynthia Baird	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:17:37 -0800
Re: ATEG Digest - 9 Feb 2008 to 10 Feb 2008 (#2008-31)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:03:39 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 9 Feb 2008 to 10 Feb 2008 (#2008-31)	Cynthia Baird	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:33:32 -0800
Re: Brad Johnston's Surveys	Cynthia Baird	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:08:27 -0800
Re: Brad's thoughts on the Flawed Survey	Cynthia Baird	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:47:45 -0800
Re: The best (was: Brad's written threats, changed to noun phrases)	Karl Hagen	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:32:26 -0800
Re: Exclamatory sentences	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:53:16 -0500
Re: Brad's written threats, changed to noun phrases	McLay, Barbara	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:35:06 -0500
Re: Exclamatory sentences	Spruiell, William C	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:51:02 -0500
Re: Grammarian's Valentine	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:47:56 -0500
Re: Brad's written threats, changed to noun phrases	Castilleja, Janet	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:41:11 -0800
Re: Grammarian's Valentine	Martha Kolln	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:13:06 -0500
Re: Brad's written threats	Geoffrey Layton	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:40:23 -0600
Re: Grammarian's Valentine	Beth Young	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:49:13 -0500
Eats Shoots and Leaves	Nancy Tuten	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:40:55 -0500
Exclamatory sentences	Scott Woods	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:17:54 -0800
Re: Brad's written threats	stacy bracher	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:11:06 -0500
Grammarian's Valentine	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:07:45 -0500
Re: Brad's written threats	McLay, Barbara	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:53:42 -0500
Re: Brad's thoughts on the Flawed Survey	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:31:04 -0500
Re: Brad's thoughts on the Flawed Survey	Craig Hancock	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:26:08 -0500
Re: Brad's written threats	Gram Marian	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:25:18 -0800
Re: Brad's thoughts on the Flawed Survey	Bruce Despain	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0700
Brad's thoughts on the Flawed Survey	Brad Johnston	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:45:55 -0800
Survey shortcomings	Brad Johnston	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:17:00 -0800
Re: Brad Johnston's Surveys	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:34:49 -0500
Re: Grammar and frames (was: Grammar defines the candidates.)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:44:08 -0500
Grammar and frames (was: Grammar defines the candidates.)	Spruiell, William C	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:26:47 -0500
Results from Brad Johnston's Survey	Brad Johnston	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:29:01 -0800
Re: Brad Johnston's Surveys	Jane Saral	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:09:37 -0500
Brad Johnston's Surveys	Gram Marian	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:33:07 -0800
Is the past perfect the past of the present perfect?	Brad Johnston	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:18:17 -0800
Re: Grammar defines the candidates.	Gregg Heacock	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:14:49 -0800
Re: tion & nouns	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:53:15 -0500
Re: tion & nouns	Jan Kammert	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:41:27 +0000
Re: Grammar defines the candidates.	Robert Yates	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:13:40 -0600
voting for someone's ghostwriter	Brad Johnston	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:42:05 -0800
Re: Grammar defines the candidates.	Craig Hancock	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:28:47 -0500
Re: Grammar defines the candidates.	Spruiell, William C	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:32:32 -0500
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Johanna Rubba	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:50:54 -0800
Re: Grammar defines the candidates.	Scott Woods	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:35:51 -0800
Redskins New Head Coach	Brad Johnston	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:22:08 -0800
Re: If at first we don't succeed	Brook Garrison	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:25:00 -0800
Grammar defines the candidates.	Gregg Heacock	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:16:51 -0800
the most articulate American	Brad Johnston	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:33:14 -0800
Re: verb tenses	Geoffrey Layton	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:09:59 -0600
Re: ATEG Digest - 9 Feb 2008 to 10 Feb 2008 (#2008-31)	Scott	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:38:03 -0500
Re: Wee, wee, moan sewer	Paul E. Doniger	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:15:44 -0800
Wee, wee, moan sewer	Brad Johnston	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:05:07 -0800
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Spruiell, William C	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:09:53 -0500
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Miller, Robert	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:59:34 -0500
pronunciation of "been"	Brad Johnston	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:49:28 -0800
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Spruiell, William C	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:28:10 -0500
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Johanna Rubba	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:02:28 -0800
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Veit, Richard	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:50 -0500
verb tenses	Brad Johnston	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:05:31 -0800
Re: If at first we don't succeed	Sloat	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:01:28 -0900
Re: If at first we don't succeed	Bruce D. Despain	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:40:42 -0700
Re: If at first we don't succeed	ruth valdes	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:14:02 -0500
Re: If at first we don't succeed	Edmond Wright	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:24:16 +0000
If at first we don't succeed	Brad Johnston	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:12:23 -0800
Re: Pronunciation of 'been'	Carol Morrison	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:56:46 -0800
Re: Pronunciation of 'been'	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:39:05 -0500
Re: done	Linda Comerford	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:54:29 -0500
Re: done	Karl Hagen	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:43:53 -0800
Re: done	Linda Comerford	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:36:38 -0500
Re: pronunciation of "been"	Carol Morrison	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:14:08 -0800
Re: done	Paul E. Doniger	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:41:19 -0800
Re: done	Nancy Tuten	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:39:01 -0500
Re: done	Linda Comerford	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:28:20 -0500
Spruiell - active work is going on all the time	Brad Johnston	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:26:33 -0800
Re: done	Karl Hagen	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:43:06 -0800
Re: pretty please fill this in for me	BINZEN, Joan	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:16:50 -0500
pretty please fill this in for me	Brad Johnston	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:22:38 -0800
Re: "please fill this in for me", continued	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:27:15 -0500
Re: Mini-article on language change (link)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:21:55 -0500
done	Jane Saral	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:30:46 -0500
Re: Grammar Wars	Nancy Tuten	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:23:22 -0500
Re: Mini-article on language change (link)	Spruiell, William C	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:40:10 -0500
Re: grammar and our folksy president	Katz, Seth	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:50:42 -0600
"please fill this in for me", continued	Brad Johnston	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:41:19 -0800
Grammar Wars	Edmond Wright	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:29:22 +0000
Re: Mini-article on language change (link)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:10:47 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 5 Feb 2008 to 6 Feb 2008 (#2008-27)	Carol Morrison	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:24:52 -0800
Re: ATEG Digest - 5 Feb 2008 to 6 Feb 2008 (#2008-27)	Scott	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:51:40 -0500
Mini-article on language change (link)	Spruiell, William C	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:38:47 -0500
Re: essays & books on the "grammar wars"	rbetting	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:33:12 -0600
Essays and books on the 'Grammar Wars'	Edmond Wright	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:14:38 +0000
Re: essays & books on the "grammar wars"	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:16:04 -0500
Re: essays & books on the "grammar wars"	Craig Hancock	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:57:42 -0500
Re: essays & books on the "grammar wars"	O'Sullivan, Brian P	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:50:16 -0500
essays & books on the "grammar wars"	Nancy Tuten	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:22:54 -0500
Re: Standard English	Craig Hancock	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:22:01 -0500
Standard English	Edmond Wright	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:57:19 +0000
Re: a president who has a strong command of the English language	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:03:56 -0500
a president who has a strong command of the English language	Brad Johnston	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:55:50 -0800
Re: grammar and our folksy president	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:48:40 -0500
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:45:25 -0500
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	Spruiell, William C	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:45:59 -0500
grammar and our folksy president	Brad Johnston	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:59:05 -0800
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	Katz, Seth	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:29:01 -0600
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	Carol Morrison	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:57:05 -0800
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton, Romney...Who has the best grammar?	Carol Morrison	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:55:03 -0800
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	Patricia Lafayllve	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:00:56 -0500
Re: McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	Elizabeth Clark	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:58:10 -0700
McCain, Obama, Clinton...Who has the best grammar?	Carol Morrison	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:17:38 -0800
Grammarians - washing up or being washed up	Brad Johnston	Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:32:26 -0800
Re: Grammarians - fill this in for me, will you please?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:05:09 -0500
Re: fill this in for me, will you please?	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:03:33 -0500
Re: fill this in for me, will you please?	Bruce Despain	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:29:41 -0700
Grammarians - fill this in for me, will you please?	Brad Johnston	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:39:29 -0800
Re: fill this in for me, will you please?	高橋　美津子	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:46:28 +0900
Re: fill this in for me, will you please?	Cynthia Baird	Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:40:30 -0800
fill this in for me, will you please?	Brad Johnston	Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:28:19 -0800
Re: Begging the question (3)	Brad Johnston	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:56:07 -0800
Re: Begging the question (3)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:25:17 -0500
Re: Begging the question (3)	STAHLKE, HERBERT F	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:22:58 -0500
Re: Begging the question (3)	Spruiell, William C	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:08:25 -0500
Re: Begging the question (3)	Castilleja, Janet	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:09:40 -0800
Begging the question (3)	Edmond Wright	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:13:22 +0000
Begging the question (2)	Edmond Wright	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:21:43 +0000
Begging the question	Edmond Wright	Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:47:30 +0000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

ATEG Archives

February 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Subject

From

Date