ATEG Archives

January 2012

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marie-Pierre Jouannaud <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:06:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
It's not just an American thing: here's what I found on the ATL website (a
British teaching union):
The Education and Inspections Act 2006 enables school staff to use "such
force as is reasonable in the circumstances to prevent a pupil from doing or
continuing to do" any of the following:
- causing personal injury to any person (including the pupil themselves)
- causing damage to the property of any person (including the pupil themselves)

Marie
France

On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 02:55:32 +0000, helene hoover <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>Marshall:
> 
>Not a problem. I worked in the legal field in a previous life and only the
lawyers my age and older have a problem with it.
> 
>Helene
> 
>
>
>
>Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:51:33 +0000
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: "They" - New 1st Pn. Genderless Singular
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Grammarphiles,
> 
>I wonder if the “they,” meaning both singular and plural, and male and
female, will ever present a legal problem:
> 
>                  Witness: I told the sheriff that  somebody (the word
could be regarded as singular since it takes a singular verb, e.g. somebody
waits) broke into my house.
> 
>                 Lawyer: Do you know who it was?
> 
>                 Witness: I don’t know but they must have had a key.
> 
>                 Lawyer: Really, so there was more than one? Let me get
this straight:  There was just one person or more than one? Are you saying
that my client acted with another person or persons?
> 
>Am I stretching credulity, or do I know lawyers too well to doubt that this
scenario would happen?
> 
>Marshall
> 
>
>
>From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Layton
>Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2011 1:46 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: "They" - New 1st Pn. Genderless Singular
> 
>
>Just in case anyone doubts that "they" is fast becoming the new default for
the genderless third person singular pronoun, here's an example from an
email I just received from something called "Spam Arrest":
> 
>Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest!
>
>Your email has been forwarded to brian koepf's inbox. All of your 
>future emails to brian koepf will also be delivered directly into 
>their inbox. 
>Far better, I think, than the awkward "him/her, his/hers, he/she" (which is
also sexist - why should the masculine precede the feminine?). 
> 
>Geoff Layton
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave
the list" 
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV
list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the
list" 
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ 		 	   		  
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2