ATEG Archives

March 1997

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Beason <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Mar 1997 14:51:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>In the past few days, once in a poem and again in a novel, both works by
>reasonably highly regarded writers--I have come across the word "hung"
>to refer to people who had committed suicide by stringing themselves up:
>e.g., "One poor client hung himself from a basement rafter--...."  I
>recall being taught that beef (and other animal) carcasses were "hung"
>for aging purposes, but that human beings were "hanged."  Is this now a
>laughably quaint distinction?
 
 
I tried referring to this convention once by telling students that "people
are never hung."  The snickers indicated that I didn't word this very well.
 
Larry Beason,Director
English Composition Program
Dept. of English
Eastern Washington University
Cheney WA 99004
[log in to unmask]
 
WAC Page: http://ewu66649.ewu.edu/WAC.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2