ATEG Archives

March 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
serdar balcı <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:41:17 EET
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
>From: SIRAISI Tomio <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: do+ OBJECT + OBJECTconstruction
>Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:18:45 +0900
>
>Dear, everyone
>
>The other day, I found a sentence
>
>1-a. The holidays seem to be doing her health good.
>
>Whenever I use the construction "do+OBJECT1+OBJECT2", I put 'somebody'
>(or some crops) in OBJECT1. So, in this case,
>
>1-b. The holidays seem to be doing her good.
>
>seem quite natural to me. Am I wrong?
>
>Other examples:
>2-a. Moderate exercise will do your health good.
>2-b. Moderate exercise will do you good.
>
>3-a. Too much drinking will do your health harm.
>3-b. Too much drinking will do you harm.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>SIRAISI Tomio

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2