ATEG Archives

November 1995

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reinhold Schlieper <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Nov 1995 20:58:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
>
> A pronoun does not stand for a noun as the name suggests.
>         subordin
> subject slot, an object slot, adverbial slots, etc.
 
I don't understand, Burkhard; can you explain why you are alluding to
these slots?
 
>
> They can be used on their own as in 'Why?' - 'Because there was no
> time.' This is a function in a 'communicateme' - a structure on one of
> the text levels.
 
Hmmm!  I can't really imagine 'why' as a pronoun; I would prefer to think
of it as a wh* interrogative marker without any particular relationship
to pronouns.  "Warum gehen wir?" would--if anything at all--stand for a
missing clause: "weil wir den Film sehen wollen" or whatever.  I seem to
remember that some grammars treat clauses as objects or subjects of
sentences.  I suppose in that round-about way, one may refer to them as
pronouns.  I hope someone else will jump right in and clear this up.
 
> Subclauses can fill functional slots in mini-paragraphs, e.g.
> conditional structures:
>     If this is so,     topic slot
>     then xxx           conclusion slot.
> Etc.
 
If . . ., then . . . consists, logically, of antecedent and consequent
and is considered one hypothetical.  In no way can the "then"-part be
thought of as a conclusion unless it pops up as the hypothetical premise
in a modus ponens.  So, I am not sure what you mean by "topic" and
"conclusion" in this context.
 
> Why we may want to put this information in focus, may have innumerable
> reasons - this has to do with life in general. Maybe the information is new
> to the hearer, or we find it fascinating, or we want to set right what
> someone else has said, and so on.
 
I don't think that the actual communicative setting needs to be relevant
to a syntactic analysis.
 
Trink 'n Bier fuer mich mit, Burkhard, ja? <grins>
 
==Cheerio, Reinhold
 ============================================================================
                         Dr. Reinhold Schlieper
Humanities Department                              500 Shadow Lakes Boulevard
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University                            Apartment 139
Daytona Beach FL  32114                                Ormond Beach FL  32174
Phone: 904-226-6664                                       Phone: 904-676-9392
 ============================================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2