Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:59:36 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 5 Feb 1996, Michael Kischner wrote:
> Would people agree that this sentence is in the passive voice?
>
> I get paid a large sum each month.
>
> So "get" is a permissible alternative to "be" in passive constructions?
"permissible" is a difficult word here. Of course, it's permissible;
who'd want to or could forbid it. But I don't think it's part of the
prestige dialect. 'get'+past participle will probably be felt to be
non-standard by many speakers. A very informal style might tolerate it.
OTOH, in response to grammar checker's flagging passives, students often
use the 'get' + past participle construction, because grammar checkers
will ignore it.
> And would people agree that in the following sentence "much" is the
> object of the verb (here a retained object, if the construction is indeed
> passive):
>
> I get paid very much for my work.
>
> So "very" is here an adjective modifying the noun "much"?
I'd assume an understood noun 'money,' 'salary,' 'fringe
benefits'--whatever. The understood part of the sentence would probably
come clear in context.
> Do other people find that their dream life tends to invade the sentences
> they make up for examples?
Yes, and my sob-conscious wishes-- I mean, like--you know, Freud would
have a heyday with me. I'd probably have a ubiquity of yonic and phallic
allusions if I'm not immensely on guard. <grin> [No, don't notify the
Ethics Committee, please . . . I'm kidding; really, I'm kidding.]
==Cheerio, Reinhold
============================================================================
Dr. Reinhold Schlieper
Humanities Department 500 Shadow Lakes Boulevard
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Apartment 139
Daytona Beach FL 32114 Ormond Beach FL 32174
Phone: 904-226-6664 Phone: 904-676-9392
Visit my home page at: http://erau.db.erau.edu/~schliepr
============================================================================
|
|
|