ATEG Archives

September 2007

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"STAHLKE, HERBERT F" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:44:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (88 lines)
There is the risk of a reductionist argument in this discussion of whether the goals of a mission statement must be measurable ("quantitatively" becomes redundant).  We've just been through the unit assessment part of the process in our university, a four-year effort driven by state mandates for teacher education programs that then became a university-wide mandate.  What happens all too easily, and what happened too often in our case, is that the questions of what's meaningful are reduced questions of what's measurable, often a different domain entirely.  And so we ended up with artifacts in each course for which we could construct explicit rubrics.  A student would be shown to have met a goal when an artifact had met the rubrics at an acceptable level.  Unfortunately, the goals of gaining scholarly rigor, curiosity, and perceptiveness are simply not in the same universe of discourse. Nor are the goals of tolerance, valuing diversity, etc.
 
Not all that is worth judging or attaining is objectively measurable, an analog to Stahlke's Law of Language:  Anything in language that you can count doesn't.
 
Herb

________________________________

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of DD Farms
Sent: Wed 9/19/2007 9:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Predictors



At 10:16 PM 9/18/2007, Paul E. Doniger wrote: . . .
>DD responded:"So true. But the schools seem to have no clearly
>assigned missions.

>I'm not sure what DD means, but every school I've worked in has had
>a mission statement, and mostly good ones.

DD: I meant an operationally definition. Not to improve the student
in something not defined, but to improve the students' score on the
ACT, or their results in some other test. Not feel good, achieve
excellence, if that is not operationally defined. I don't mind a
definition that strives for more students passing the National Latin
Test, nor achieve a lower drop out rate.

>My present school's mission (and I hope to stay here for the rest of
>my career) is as follows: "The mission of Pomperaug Regional High
>School, a caring community committed to excellence, is to educate
>each student to become a productive, responsible, enlightened
>citizen and a creative life-long learner through high quality,
>dynamic, innovative learning experiences in collaboration with the
>Region 15 community."

DD: And how is one supposed to measure that?

>It seems a pretty "clearly assigned mission" to me, and one that
>drives our curriculum; it's well worth supporting. We are constantly
>asked to hold our students accountable to a high standard.

DD: What standard?

>We also try to keep the community involved (it's easy for me,
>running a theatre program that depends on parents and local
>businesses being involved).
>I often wonder where people get their ideas about public schools and
>what goes on inside them Certainly, having taught both in the inner
>cities and in a blue collar town, I have seen some of the failings
>that have been mentioned in this thread, but mostly, I've seen good
>teaching and very little "dumbing down." . . .

DD: I have also taught in the public school system. I did my utmost
to achieve what I thought was desirable, but no clear mission statement had I.

>  What really causes problems for education are often those things
> that are out of our control: Budget cuts, large classes (usually a
> result of budget restraints), unfunded government mandates (like
> Craig, I am "not a fan" of NCLB -- actually, I hate the thing),
> standardized testing interrupting the process, consumerism,
> materialism, technological distractions (TV was just the
> beginning), and the drive to focus on the goal of creating a work
> force rather than creating "good citizens" in a Jeffersonian sense.

DD: I note you specify "education." Undefined. No clear mission statement.

>Add to this that since the 1940s, 12 years of public education has
>become the minimal requirement for every American; there is a
>greater percentage of people who are expected to graduate from high
>school than ever in history -- and the stigma of not graduating is
>immense, both socially and economically.

DD: So the standards for so doing have been reduced to see it that they do.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2