ATEG Archives

March 1998

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Undetermined origin c/o LISTSERV administrator <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 08:53:36 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
ju tianyi wrote:
 
> Dear Professors:
>
> Here is a sentence I read days ago.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Today tropical swamps and marshes are undergoing the most rapid
> accumulation of peat, with rates in Borneo of 17m in 4000 years.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder how to distinguish the "swamp " and "marsh" here.  As I know they
> are all different kinds of geographical phenomena ( but quite similar ) in
> this sentence. But they are of the same meaning according to my dictionary
> ( wet and lower land or the land with shallow water and grass ). Could you
> tell me what is the tiny difference?
>
> TIA
>
> Tianyi
 
  Tianyi--
 
I would guess that most native speakers would have difficulty making the
distinction between "marsh" and "swamp."  I know I did.  From what I found in
Webster's  Dictionary, it looks like they are both areas of wet land, but a
swamp is characterized by having woody vegetation (such as trees) and a marsh
is characterized by having grassy vegetation (weeds, cattails, etc.).  I don't
know of any other distinction other than this one.  Maybe someone else could
add some more insight.
 
                                I hope this helps.
                                Darrin Jones

ATOM RSS1 RSS2