Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:16:10 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 06:25 AM 1/30/2008, STAHLKE, HERBERT F wrote:
>DD,
>Here's the relevant portion of the OED entry for "decimate." {And
>cited definition 4b.} . . .
DD: I know that the dictionaries go to usage. That hoi polloi use the
word in their ignorance of the underlying derivation does not bother
me. From a Information Theory view, I know what they mean.
>If you look at the full entry, the military meaning as applied to
>the Roman army practice of killing every tenth man in a mutinous
>unit is the third meaning. The first two, which are obsolete, are
>"tithing" and "dividing into tenths." . . .
DD: The point being it originally had the general meaning of one tenth.
>I think you may almost be guilty of the etymological fallacy. But
>it was only the third meaning, so you're partly exonerated.
DD: I think not. I was implying, not the Roman practice so much, as
the idea of tenth. Still I fall often to word folly.
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|