ATEG Archives

March 2006

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stahlke, Herbert F.W." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:46:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (155 lines)
Great post, Joanna, as usual!

Herb

-----Original Message-----
From: Johanna Rubba [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:03 PM
To: Stahlke, Herbert F.W.
Cc: Jo Rubba
Subject: post, please?

Hi, Herb,

My account is supposed to be fixed, but apparently it is not. Could you 
post this for me?

"Running from the back of his skull down to the front, is a patch of 
white hair that opens up into his lips."

My main question about this sentence is how on earth a patch of white 
hair can get from the front of the skull to a position opening up into 
one's lips. Is this a description of a noseless jetti??

The comma shouldn't be there. Beyond that, this is a sentence with a 
non-basic order: the participal phrase "running from the back of his 
skull down to the front" is placed before the verb, and the subject ("a 
patch of white hair that opens up into his lips") after the verb. 
"Running" etc. is not in focus position. Here, systemic grammar gives 
us a better way to think about it, as "theme", i.e., a phrase that 
introduces or sets the scene for the rest of the sentence. Subject is 
not a typical focus position; if I'm right, focus position is usually 
after the verb. In fact, I would say that "a patch of white hair 
[etc.]" is in focus position -- it is the salient part of the sentence; 
the participial phrase is set up to give us a reference point by which 
we can locate it. There is no other possible analysis of this 
sentence's structure.

Other examples of this kind of structure:

a. Lying on the table was the bloody knife that had been used in the 
murder.
b. Gone were the ancestors we so revered.

Some will say that the participials here are part of the verb phrase, 
since we can paraphrase them thus:

i. The bloody knife that had been used in the murder was lying on the 
table.
ii. The ancestors we so revered were gone.  -- That "gone" is 
predicative here and not part of the verb phase is proven by "was", 
which would need to be "have" if "gone" were in the verb phrase.

These are similar to those cases in which it is hard to tell whether a 
sentence is passive or predicative:

iii. The windows of the old house were broken.
iv. The windows were broken by the storm's strong winds.

Aspect helps sort out which structure underlies the sentence. The reason

"A patch of white hair that opens up into his lips is running from the 
back of his skull down to the front."

sounds bad is that the aspect is wrong. With an action verb like "run", 
the default reading of progressive aspect ("be" + "-ing") is present 
time, as in:

"Time is running out as we speak."

The sentence we are discussing here describes a state, a stable 
situation that holds over time, or an abiding characteristic of a 
person. For such sentences we use plain present tense, one of whose 
functions is to describe states that hold at the time of speaking or 
generic truths:

"A patch of white hair that opens up into his lips runs from the back 
of his skull down to the front."

Regarding "run", this kind of meaning is known as "fictive motion" in 
Cognitive Grammar. "Running" describes the trajectory your vision would 
trace if you were looking at him (with the back of his skull specified 
as the starting point). Similar examples:

v. The road winds through the mountains.  -- It's the traveling 
object/person that does the winding, not the road. The road just lies 
there.
vi. The sea bottom slopes steeply down beyond this point.  -- "Slope" 
is used as a verb describing the motion of an object that would move 
along the sea bottom, not the sea bottom itself. The sea bottom just 
has a particular geometric relationship to nearby reference points.

Note that the simple present tense is used to describe the stable 
configuration of the road and the sea bottom.

This is a metonymy, not a metaphor. The object viewed or traveled upon 
(patch of white hair, road, sea bottom) stands in for the vision of an 
observer or the motion of an object. In metaphor, properties of the 
source are transferred to the target. The speaker is not suggesting 
that the patch of hair, road, or sea bottom has the properites of the 
directed vision of an observer or an object that moves. Metonymy 
underlies many, many everyday expressions, and serves as a mechanism to 
extend the meanings of verbs. Examples:

Your dog smells bad.  (It's the nose that does the smelling.)
Your dog smells badly. (It would fail a bloodhound test.)

John looks a little sick. (John is not doing the looking, an observer 
is.)

My favorite metonymy is one that was spoken by a garage mechanic in 
Ohio or Indiana many years ago when I was on a long drive from Illinois 
to New Jersey. I was driving a Pinto that had occasional leaks from its 
universal joint. I stopped at a garage on the way to have it looked at 
and greased if necessary. Here's what the man said:

"Hey, Joe, open up Bay Three. This lady needs her rear end lubed."

This is an example of POSSESSOR FOR POSSESSED -- we use a phrase naming 
to the owner to refer to the object owned. Nobody else in the shop 
batted an eye, but for some reason the literal meaning hit me between 
the eyes, and I blushed. This sentence is not metaphorical -- it does 
not attribute to the car any of my characteristics. It is merely an 
abbreviated reference, shortening "This lady's car".

Other typical metonymies:

NAME OF PLACE FOR INSTITUTION LOCATED AT THAT PLACE:  "Washington has 
not yet taken a position on the treaty."
AUTHOR FOR WORK: "James Mitchener takes up a full two feet of my 
bookshelf."
PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT: "Can you hand me a Kleenex?"
SUBSTANCE USED FOR ACTION OF USING IT: "Please butter my toast."  "I 
have to grease the pan."
ACTION FOR INSTRUMENT: "She was hammering away at the floorboards."

And numerous others. For a fuller list, see George Lakoff and Mark 
Johnsons' _Metaphors We Live By_, 1982, U Chicago Press.


Johanna Rubba, Assoc. Prof., Linguistics
Linguistics Minor Advisor
English Department
Cal Poly State University
San Luis Obispo, CA 93047
Tel. 805.756.2184
Dept. Tel. 805.756.6374
Home page:
http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2