Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:43:56 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Though it's idiosyncratic, it seems to me that the concept of
coordinating conjunctions might explain this more elegantly.
Both pickup trucks and sedans are sold in some areas of California.
Either pickup trucks or sedans are sold in some areas of California.
I understand that
(a) *more* can be adj., adv., or noun and *than* is typically a
conjunction or preposition, and
(b) "more . . . than" specifies a difference in quantity that "both . .
. and" and "either . . . or" do not.
However, together, "more . . . than" seems to function the same way as
the coordinating conjunctions.
So I posit that *than* promotes *more* - functionally - to the status of
a conjunction.
Jeanne Rodgers wrote:
> How is "than" functioning in the following sentence, as a subordinating conjunction introducing an unconventionally placed ellipitical clause or as a preposition?
>
> More pickup trucks than sedans are sold in some areas of California.
>
> Jeanne Rodgers
> CSU, Sacramento
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|