ATEG Archives

November 1997

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Yates <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Nov 1997 14:05:40 CST
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
On Mon, 10 Nov 1997 15:45:54 -0500 EDWARD VAVRA said:
>Since clause conjunctions do not always appear in
>surface structure, who is to say that they must exist in
>deep structure? And, if they do exist, how do they
>exist? For example, in the "since" vs. "because" query,
>in deep structure does the clause conjunction exist as
>a word (Which one?), an idea (causation), or as a
>function (subordination)? Aren't we getting into
>ontological arguments here? I'm not sure of how this
>applies to the high-school or undergraduate college
>classroom.
 
I think Ed raises an very interesting question: if something
is not on the surface, is it there at all?
 
All of the following sentences have the word "cut" in them.
Would we want to tell students that "cut" is the same in all those
sentence?
 
1) I cut my finger every time I slice onions.
2) Mary cut her finger.
3) Mary has cut her finger.
4) Mary will not cut her finger.
5) Mary could have cut her finger.
6) Mary does not want to cut her finger.
 
Bob Yates, Central Missouri State University, [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2