Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:52:46 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Traditional lists of coordinating conjunctions included "for" (hence the "F" in the acronym "FANBOYS" for remembering the list of coordinating conjunctions); but it seems to me that the use of "for" as a coordinating conjunction in English has largely been succeeded by the use of "because."
I find I'm not sure here what the distinction is between a coordinating conjunction and a subordinating conjunction. Help?
Dr. Seth Katz
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Bradley University
________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of T. J. Ray
Sent: Wed 4/13/2011 6:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Punctuation Question
I believe you're right in thinking he feels this is a coordinate conjunction. My understanding is that
"because" clauses are dependent and hence should not be preceded with a comma. I just
wanted a number of opinions before I bring it to the committee's attention, folks who evidently
don't see a problem with it as no one had marked any of these before I saw the MSS.
Thanks for your time.
On Wednesday 04/13/2011 at 5:43 am, "Dixon, Jack" wrote:
Focusing on the obvious, I suspect the writer believes that "because" functions as a coordinating conjunction rather than a subordinating. Does the student punctuate most subordinating clauses that follow the independent clause this way, or do he make this mistake with "because" only?
I seem to remember that Martha Kolln in _Rhetorical Grammar_ addresses the few instances when terminal subord. clauses are set off with commas.
________________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of T. J. Ray [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 8:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Punctuation Question
I have a doctoral student who produces sentences like the following:
"This quatrain cannot be read in isolation at all, because the syntax
is
inherent and incomplete on its own."
My question is not a search for whatever he meant to say but is about
his punctuation: the comma. Comments are welcome.
T. J.
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|