ATEG Archives

October 2010

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Reynolds <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:40:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 2010-10-18, at 10:54 AM, Marshall wrote:

> Modals are not verbs, as they were earlier in the history of the English language, according to the theory of grammar I was taught. Textbooks also treat it not as a verb.
> 
> So what I'm asking is, is this an example of a form of the modal "would" when it was still a verb? In particular, Is this the a past tense form of "wish" when it was still a verb?

In old English, 'wolde' was past tense of 'willan'. That same relationship holds true today. 'Would' is still the past tense of 'will'. As far as I can tell, 'would' has never been a form of 'wish'.

Best,
Brett

-----------------------
Brett Reynolds
English Language Centre
Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
[log in to unmask]

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2