Ed,
   I think that's a very reasonable question to ask. Should we go with
more traditional terminology (like gerund) or for a revised
understanding? Uniform terminology is one issue and what we choose is
another.
   Before the conference, I'll be getting materials from England (NATE
curriculum documents), and I'll bring them with me. (I'll also have
ordering information if people want their own copies.)>I believe they
have already addressed that issue; it will be interesting to see their
choices.

Craig


Craig,
>    Is the "scope" question going to deal with what terminology should
> be used, or is that problem going to be left wide open? In one of the
> two last issues of the ATEG journal, I noted that "gerund" does not
> appear to be an acceptable term.
> Thanks,
> Ed
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
> at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/