ATEG Archives

October 1996

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johanna Rubba <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Oct 1996 18:50:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
To complicate the answer to the simple question, look at it this way:
'term' is a noun, but it is a noun with a 'hole' in it -- we expect
something (a technical word) to 'fill the hole'. 'Chivalry' fills the
hole. In other words, 'term' and 'chivalry' are in a head/complement
relationship. 'Chivalry' is a sort of noun-phrase-internal complement to
the head 'term'. We don't _have_ to fill the hole (i.e. realization of
the complement is optional, not obligatory), but we can.
 
I don't know if there is a traditional-grammar equivalent of
'noun-phrase-internal complement'.
 
Johanna
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba   Assistant Professor, Linguistics              ~
English Department, California Polytechnic State University   ~
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407                                     ~
Tel. (805)-756-2184  E-mail: [log in to unmask]      ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2