ATEG Archives

September 2011

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"R. Michael Medley (ck)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:44:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I apologize for leaving one of my sentences incomplete.  Here is my
complete thought:

And although I don't like #3 either [(3) This is just between you and I.],
it is extremely common, and I have even heard it in formal academic (oral)
presentations.  I think the appearance of the nominative form of pronouns
in a compound object construction like this is interesting because almost
no speaker ever uses the nominative form in objects that are not compound.
 This phenomenon seems to signal something to us about the nature of
compound NPs.  I think Pinker in The Language Instinct has something to
say about this construction, but I can't find the reference.


R. Michael Medley, Ph.D.
Professor of English
Eastern Mennonite University

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2