ATEG Archives

February 2006

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Eduard C. Hanganu" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:42:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Dear Paul:

The problem is with the lack of a consensus on terminology, and this 
problem will never go away. Nevertheless, we cannot define something 
through a pleonasm, which is failed logic. 

Eduard 




On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Paul E. Doniger wrote...

>If the term is so confusing, then how should we distinguish between 
a grammar based on the work of linguists and a more traditional 
grammar? How, for example, would we distinguish between a grammar 
that refers to say, predicate adjective/predicate nominative and one 
that refers to subject complements? Traditional grammarians talk 
about articles while lingusits talk about determiners. Why can't we 
coin the term Lingusitic Grammar to distinguish the different 
approach?
>   
>  Paul D.
>
>"Eduard C. Hanganu" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  Dear Phil:
>
>In "A Student's Dictionary of Language and Linguistics," Trask 
(1997) 
>defines *grammar* as "that part of the structure of a language which 
>includes sentence structure(syntax) and word structure (morphology)" 
>(p. 29). As linguists well know, *morphology and *syntax* are an 
>integral and part of the science of language, which is 
*linguistics.* 
>
>The term *linguistic grammar* is not a linguistic expression.It is a 
>pleonasm, a redundant expression, which confuses those who are not 
>familiar with linguistics and its subfields. 
>
>Regards,
>
>Eduard 
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Phil Bralich wrote...
>
>>I have been in grammar/syntax for over 25 years, but it is only on 
>this list that I have heard of "Linguistic Grammar." Are there 
>formal descriptions and discussion of it available in journals and 
>books? Are there recognized authors on the subject? Also, does 
>anyone know where I might get a copy of Tim Hadley's dissertation? 
>>
>>Phil Bralich
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web 
interface at:
>http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>  
>
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web 
interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2