ATEG Archives

July 2001

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johanna Rubba <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 14:41:20 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
There's a differentiation in the use of commas around appositives that I
haven't seen anyone remark on yet. When the item is definite--already
introduced into the discourse--commas are used around the appositive.
When it is indefinite--being mentioned for the first time with the noun
phrase that the appositive accompanies--the commas can be left off.


Compare A, in which the sentence with the sculpture's title is the first
mention of the sculpture, with B, in which the sculpture is introduced
with the first sentence and continues to be a topic in the second.

A. We visited a museum recently that displayed several famous Rodin
sculptures. The sculpture 'The Discus Thrower' was beautiful to behold.

vs.

B. We saw a famous Rodin sculpture at the museum. The sculpture, 'The
Discus Thrower', was beautiful to behold.

This is probably a subcase of the restrictive/non-restrictive rule--in A
the second sentence picks out 'The Discus Thrower' from among all the
sculptures. There is only one candidate referent for 'the sculpture' in
the second sentence of B, so the title is non-restrictive. It's no
wonder people get confused about these comma rules. They're subtle.

Johanna Rubba

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2