ATEG Archives

February 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"STAHLKE, HERBERT F" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:17:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Jane,

That sounds like one you might want to post on the American Dialect Society list ADS-L.  They follow closely ongoing changes in American English.  I don't know if this use of "may" is a mistake or a change in progress.  I certainly react to it as you did.

Herb


-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Jane Saral
Sent: Sat 2/16/2008 10:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: May and might
 
In this morning's Atlanta Journal Costitution is the following head and
subhead:

Study: Slow decisions hurt help for Marines
Tougher truck may have saved troops

I would say that the word *might* should have been used, since they were not
saved.  *May* seems to me appropriate only if they were saved and one is
speculating as to why.

Is that a correct assumption?  And could someone explain the differences
between the two forms?

Jane Saral

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2