Hi all,

I have a problem with the grammar structure/puctuation of the sentence
below, that one student used in an essay.

"In those classes, which Constructivist teaching is not the primary
approach; I have had some good encounters and some not so good encounters."

My correction was to add "in" before "which", so that it reads:

"In those classes in which Constructivist teaching is not the primary
approach; I have had some good encounters and some not so good encounters."

My opinion is that the "which" clause in its original version is not
entirely grammatical, since the referent is not "classes which
contructivist teaching", but we are talking about classes "in which"
constructivism is not used. If you miss the "in", it looks like the classes
themselves are attached a "constructivist teaching" condition, which makes
for an awkard reading.

Could you comment on the correctness (prescriptive or descriptive) and
clarity of the original sentence?

Also, what about the use of the semi-colon? Would that be something to
change also?

One of the problems is, this student says her mother is an English teacher,
and she didn't see anything wrong  with the version without the "in"
particle. Can I make a case for the contrary? If I can't, I don't have any
problem accepting an impartial, unbiased, professional opinion, even if it
contradicts my intuitive opinion. That's why I'm asking in the forum  :-)

Thanks in advance.


Roberto Perez
[log in to unmask]

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/