ATEG Archives

April 2009

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruce Despain <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:14:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
Marshall,

Thank you for your response.  I think the adjective "general" as in "attorney general," that was subject of a list query last week, would fill the bill.  

The point of calling the prepositions "adpositions" was presumably the existence (even in English) of such one-off forms that call for their own extra-ordinary positioning. I was questioning the analysis, but it is possible that there is change in the language underway or idioms left as a relicts of earlier grammars. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Myers, Marshall
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Adpositions in English

Bruce,

Isn't there a single word adjective that follows the word it modifies? "Galore"?

Are there others?

I thought "galore" might be a French word that retained the position in French, but apparently it's not.

Marshall

Marshall

-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bruce Despain
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Adpositions in English

I read in a recent introduction to syntax that English has at least one "preposition" that follows its object.  The example given was "ago" as in "three weeks ago."  I have been inclined to take this as a temporal adverb with a degree modification quite common with adverbs.  It thus serves as an adverbial phrase like many prepositional phrases.  The phrase "three weeks before" seems to imply "three weeks before the time under discussion."  This does not seem to make "before" a post-posed preposition.  I can see that if it did, we might have an argument for "ago" being post-posed.  Has anyone on list seen this sort of analysis?  

Bruce



 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2