ATEG Archives

November 1995

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Kischner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 13:32:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Whether we are talking about sentences, paragraphs, or whole books, it
has always been clear to me that defining "the main idea" is hopeless,
since it has as much or more to do with the audience as it does with ther
speaker.  Consider a case in which young Jeremy, not a stellar student,
comes home and announces: "If I get A's on my nexct three French tests, I
can get a C in the course!"
 
Jeremy's father (whom Jeremy will remember as the kind of father for whom
Jeremy could never be good enough), answers, "That's a big 'if'!"
 
Jeremy's mother (a saint), answers, "A C in French -- won't that be
wonderful!"
 
For the father, the main idea was in the subordinate clause; for the
mother, it was in the main clause.  Neither structure nor placement has
anything to do with it!
 
Michael Kischner

ATOM RSS1 RSS2