ATEG Archives

October 1997

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brenda S. Campbell" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:05:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hello again...
 
I just delivered my short basics course, and it went -- well, I wouldn't say
swimmingly, but better than I expected.
 
A problem arose when I tried to get legal secretaries to recognize
sentence fragments.  I gave several examples of sentence fragments
and tried to explain where either subject or verb was missing by defining
the parts of speech (e.g. "Some of the attorneys working on the Phillips
case"; I defined "working" as an adjective modifying "attorneys," etc.)
Perhaps not surprisingly, I wasn't getting across to some people.
 
Any other tips on getting people to recognize sentence fragments?  This
wasn't as big a problem with the lawyers; though they tend to write in
fragments, they can usually spot them and know how to make
corrections.  But it was a problem for secretaries and proofreaders.
 
Thanks for all the tips on this project.  I'm confident I made sense to at
least half the class  ;-)
_______________________________________________
Brenda S. Campbell
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
600 Atlantic Ave.
Boston, MA 02210
(617) 720-3500 (voice)  (617) 720-2441 (fax)
_______________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2