ATEG Archives

February 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Lemoine <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:44:33 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> 1. I would prefer that we wait a little longer.
> 2. I would prefer that we waited a little longer.
> (This is not a
> statement about the past; it's a statement of a
> preference about the present.)
> 3. I would prefer that we had waited a little
> longer. (This is a
> statement about the past; something that the speaker
> wishes had happened
> but it didn't happen.)

Johanna (and others),

Don't you think 3. would sound better as in the
following?

3. I would have preferred that we had waited a little
longer.

Kevin

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2