Linda:

 

With some differences, your interesting distinction may apply also to the verb "love."  We mean different things when we say "I love this book" and "I am loving this book," and there is more at work than the distinction between present and present progressive.



	-----Original Message----- 

	From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Linda DiDesidero 

	Sent: Wed 11/23/2005 9:34 AM 

	To: [log in to unmask] 

	Cc: 

	Subject: Re: "was meaning" (was Grammar and Writing)

	

	

	

	Tim and Bill--

	Thanks for your replies! And Tim, I certainly did not mean to imply anything about 'correctness'!  Regional variations in usage are interesting to me, and I'd never heard this one before.

	 

	It strikes me that this usage represents a kind of broadened meaning of this verb in this Southern dialect (and perhaps it holds for other verbs as well).  The participant in the 'meaning' event is actively doing the meaning--do you know what I mean?  For me to 'mean' something is different than for me to 'be meaning' something.  The progressive demands more intention and more activity to the event expressed by the verb, particularly when you've got a human participant in the subject position.  

	 

	And maybe that is the difference for me:  A word means, a painting means, a statement means--but these inanimate things cannot 'be meaning' something, right?  interesting. So humans who 'mean' can do so in perhaps measurable stages or in events which progress over time, so that at any single moment, a human can 'be meaning' one thing instead of another.

	 

	I know, I'm wierd to find this interesting. Thanks again for the insights! 

	 

	Linda DiDesidero 



To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" 



Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/