ATEG Archives

February 2011

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Terry Lynn Irons <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:02:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
Brad,

Why is "where they had lived for 67 years" not a past perfect form?  What is it?
--
--
Fraternally,
Terry
(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)
Terry Lynn Irons        [log in to unmask]
Voice Mail:             (606) 783-5164
Snail Mail:             150 University BLVD UPO 604 Morehead, KY 40351
(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)=(*)

________________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brad Johnston [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: On meanings of the past perfect

tj,

Here's another example from yesterday's WashPost: "And it was before they had to leave their beloved row house in Upper Darby, Pa., where they had lived for 67 years."

All past perfects are formed by had + a past participle
but all occurrences of had plus a past participle are not past perfects.

Look for them. They're everywhere.

.brad.15feb11.

~~~~~~~

From: Brad Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 10:05:43 AM
Subject: Re: On meanings of the past perfect

tj,

A corpus makes it easy for you but another easy way is to just look at what passes you by.

From yesterday's Washington Post Magazine, "He still speaks with sorrow about the first two: a girl he met just after graduating college who, it turned out, was still seeing her ex-boyfriend; and a woman he met on a Metro platform with whom he started "this really intense, amazing, passionate thing", but who eventually told him she had "found Christ and was gonna be celibate until she got married".

She "had found" Christ? Relative to what? The Third Crusade?
Look around. They're everywhere.

.br-had.valentinesday.2011.

Meanwhile, please tell me ...

What is it? What is the past perfect? What would you write on the board for them to scribble into their notebooks and carry away when the bell rings? "The past perfect is ..."


________________________________
From: Brad Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sun, February 13, 2011 2:25:25 PM
Subject: Re: On meanings of the past perfect

tj,

Click on corpus.byu.edu<http://corpus.byu.edu/> and enter 'had' plus the past participle of 'shared' or 'include' or 'use' (to take three verbs from your message) and you will see some. I know they're there without looking because it is a common occurrence.

Meanwhile, please tell me ...

What is it? What is the past perfect? What would you write on the board for them to scribble into their notebooks and carry away when the bell rings? "The past perfect is ..."

Thanks for participating.

.br-had.sun.13feb11.

________________________________
From: T. J. Ray <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sun, February 13, 2011 11:13:49 AM
Subject: Re: On meanings of the past perfect

Brad,

As  you seem to have the corner on the meaning of "past perfect," perhaps  you
will share it with me.  In doing so, please include a sentence or two that use
"had + a past participle" that is not past perfect.

Happy Valentine's Day.

tj


On Saturday 02/12/2011 at 7:45 pm, Brad Johnston wrote:
Welcome, T.J.,

What is it? What is the past perfect? What would you write on the board for them to scribble into their notebooks and carry away when the bell rings? "The past perfect is ..."

Please, please, please don't say "the past perfect is had + a past participle". If you want to get the jump on understanding it, note that all past perfects are formed by had + a past participle but all occurrences of had + a past participle are not past perfects.

You need a different source than the one you used below, which only got you one right out of three.

Thanks for stopping by.

.brad.sat.12feb11.




To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2