From a legal standpoint, there's a sense in which the sentence isn't
ambiguous at all. It pins down the point that the juror's marital
history -- regardless of whether she was married at the time or not --
is relevant in that it is potentially prejudicial.  

Bill Spruiell

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/