ATEG Archives

August 2004

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stahlke, Herbert F.W." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:57:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
This example highlights one of the problems with standardized tests for grammar and mechanics, the assumption that there is a clear correct answer.  The better treatments of punctuation would allow all of these as correct answers.  A. works becausse the second clause is a logical consequence of the first.  B. works for essentially the same reason, the close logical link between the two clauses allowing a comma.  C. works if the author intends to make two separate, less related points.  D. works for the same reasons as A. and B., a comma not obligatory before a coordinating conjunction if the second clause has a close logical relationship to the first.  Granted, C. is probably the only one taught to most high school students, aside from the "; however," option not included as a possibility.  But better writers even at the high school level know that punctuation is neither that simple nor that inflexible, and a good writer recognizes the different meanings associated with the four answers, even a good high school writer.

So what makes C. right?  Is it that it is a default?  Arguably there are no defaults in punctuation:  it's to closely related to meaning.  Is it that it is what the test writers expect?  In that case this is a naked example of teaching to the test:  the test sets up artificial, unrealistic, and untrue standards that deny what good writers know.

Herb

> > Item #2:
> >
> > The frightened pilot's face was ashen as he
> gingerly lowered the plane onto the Smiths' private
> __________ that time was running out for his ailing
> friend.
> >
> > A. runway: he knew
> >
> > B. runway, he knew
> >
> > C. runway. He knew
> >
> > D. runway but he knew
> >
> > There are two perfectly acceptable answers here:
> A and C.  I can also construe a very reasonable
> context that would make D acceptable.
>
Your D answer is not acceptable; that would be a run
on in my book. Sorry. I agree, however, with the A and C

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2