ATEG Archives

January 2001

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gretchen Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:36:16 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Hi, Everyone,

A friend of mine is setting up a grammar class at the high school level.  She
is planning on it being a class on analyzing the language - not a
grammar-to-improve-writing class.  I've pasted her post to NCTE (with
permission) here and am requesting any advice you have for her.  She's not
sure how to structure the class.

What should a high school grammar/linguists class curriculum look like?

Thanks,
Gretchen in San Jose
*************
Jan, LouAnn and others,
    I will send you stuff as soon as I know what I am doing.  I mean, I
know I am going to be teaching grammar, and I know we will cover
sentence structure, fragments, run ons, simple, compound, complex,
compound-complex and try to write a Henry James sentence (Or Jack
Kerouac sentence for that matter).  Also all sorts of phrases, clauses,
verb and pronoun usage, general usage problems, coordination and
subordination and other logical type stuff.
    Just thinking of how to approach it.  I want to incorporate technology,
use the friday writing and still see that the kids learn what they want
to learn.  I am thinking of jigsawing some of the information so that
certain groups become "experts" and present to the rest of the class.
Might be where we can incorporate  technology there.  Powerpoint etc.  I
think, in light of Brenda's thread, the friendly little gerund deserves
his own web site don't you?

Pat Schulze in SD who is getting ideas as I type this.

Louann Reid wrote:
>
> I agree that when students want to learn something they will, and that's
one of
> the key features of the class Pat describes--besides Pat's own spirit and
> enthusiasm, as Jan points out.  Another key feature is that grammar is being
> taught just as I believe it should be--as a study of language structure to
> students able to deal with that kind of conceptual thinking.  Too often the
> debate over teaching grammar focuses only on the qualifier that such
teaching
> has little effect on writing.  I agree that teaching grammar in order to
improve
> students' writing has probably not been worth the time it takes.  HOWEVER,
> teaching grammar so that people will understand their language ought to be
> highly effective.  Good luck and keep us posted!
>
> Louann
>
> Monica Bomengen wrote:
>
> > Jan posted,
> >
> > <<PATS! - send syllabus/lesson plans or post on your web page or let me
send
> > you postage! I'm interested in seeing how you tackle this.
> >
> > I think what may make the difference in this is that kids are choosing to
> > sign up for it, rather than having it thrust upon them. That--plus your
own
> > special spirit and enthusiasm--will make it work just fine.>>
> >
> > Absolutely correct.  When kids WANT and NEED to learn something, they'll
> > seek it out.  What a great thing, that 30 kids signed up for this course.
> >
> > Monica B
> > ______

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2