Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:49:20 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree in part with several of the other responses, and I myself see
"manufactures" far too often from my students. I don't have as many contacts with
K-12 teachers as I would like, but those I have suggested that the mistake may be
the result of a deemphasis on (in some cases a total lack of) instruction in basic
prefixes and suffixes. Apparently, many students are no longer being taught that
"-er" means "one who." Lacking this sense of meaning, the students simply go with
the sound of the word.
Ed V.
Greg Dyer wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> Thus far I've merely been a lurker on this list, but a recently
> submitted paper prompted me to share this rather trivial
> comment/question. A few years ago, when I was teaching a technical
> writing class for engineering majors, I began to notice students using
> the word "manufactures" as a noun in place of "manufacturers."
> Consider, for example, the following sentence: "Tire manufactures state
> the tire is worn out once it reaches this minimal tread." This use of
> the word drives me absolutely nuts, but it happens often enough that I'm
> beginning to wonder if the usage of the word has changed (or is
> changing), at least within the technical professions. Has anyone else
> noticed a similar usage?
>
> Greg Dyer
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|