ATEG Archives

December 1997

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Dubinsky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Dec 1997 15:37:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> This  message was  originally submitted  by [log in to unmask]
to
> the ATEG list
>
> The following is a contribution to the discussion of the structure of
> "the she of England is unhappy."
>
> "As articles are by their nature definitives, it follows of course,
> that they cannot be united with such words as are in their own nature
> as definite as they may be; nor with such words which, being
> indefinite, cannot properly be made otherwise:  but only with those
> words which, though indefinite, are yet capable, through the article,
> of becoming definite.  Hence we see the reason why it is absurd to
> say "the I" or "the thou," because nothing can make these pronouns
> more definite than they are; and the same can be said of proper
> names."  --"Of Universal Grammar."  The Encyclopedia Britannica,
> 1771.
>
> Sincerely, Robert Einarsson
> please visit my web site at
> www.artsci.gmcc.ab.ca/people/einarssonb
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2