ATEG Archives

September 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Candace Davies <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:48:41 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
The way to solve the problem is to find someone the child can play with. LOL

Candace

Aram Mrktychev wrote:

> "(1)The little child is lonely; he would be happier if he had someone
> that he can play with."
>
> I'm trying to understand what "can" or "could" has something to do with a
> subjunctive mood in this sentence because all I see here is that word
> "would" only determines a subjunctive mood. The only reason why it is not
> clear and people got stocked on words "can" and "could" is because in this
> sentence essential phrase " he would be happier " stands before "if."  I'm
> not sure if there is any standard form of sentences exists for each rule,
> but it is more comfortable for me to see a subjunctive mood here if you will
> rephrase this sentence a little bit: "The little child is lonely; if he had
> someone to play with, he would be happier." But I definitely won't use
> "that" for the relative clause. Also I want to say that "can" and "could" in
> this sentence don't sound wrong because we got used to listen to many errors
> in modern spoken English that we are just simply having hard time to define
> what is wrong and what is right. When millions of people speak in an
> improper way it is kind of hard to say that everyone of them is wrong.
> Respectfully yours, Aram

ATOM RSS1 RSS2