ATEG Archives

January 1999

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ronald Barliant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:15:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Dear Paul,

I have taught in four different Chicago schools and enjoyed almost every
day of teaching, but you are right in your observation that students have
too much negative stimuli to be interested in most reading assignments and
in writing, let alone revising their work.  

My own experience is that daily brief sentence work that builds on
carefully sequenced skills and then a short free write that credits both
interest and quantity of writing gives students a new interest and
confidence in their writing.  McDougal/Littell has such a sequence and I
made sure to start at their level.  Older students moved through more than
one year because I was careful not to repeat lessons too often and to
combine more than one or two types of errors as we worked.  They were able
to find their own grammatical mistakes easily by the end of the year.

I'm still struggling with revision, but it has helped to consider what I
myself need when it comes to revising a draft:  very specific suggestions
that relate to organization, support, logic, or point of view.

I hope that you will find your students' appreciation for your effort and
interest as rewarding as I have.

Sincerely,

Lois Barliant

ATOM RSS1 RSS2