At 02:25 PM 7/15/2006, Roberto Perez wrote:
>I'm creating a handout to introduce the Direct Object Pronoun to my 
>class. I gave it to some colleagues to proofread, and a debate 
>started over whether "whom" or "who" should be used in the 
>explanations. This is an excerpt of the text:
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>You can identify the direct object by asking the question "what?" or "whom?"
>[...]
>...a direct object can also be the person we are referring to. So, 
>in a sentence like:
>"The dog chased Alice"
>"Alice", the person we are referring to, is the direct object. 
>"Whom" did the dog chase? Alice.
>Similarly, in the sentence:
>"The car hit Andrew",
>  "Andrew" is the direct object. "Whom" did the car hit? Andrew.
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>Several colleagues corrected me by saying the DO pronoun responds to 
>the question "who", not "whom", and that the two examples are 
>grammatically incorrect: they should read "Who did the dog chase" 
>and "Who did the car hit". . . .

DD: No certified Grammar Expert, but, "Who did the dog chase?" 
implies there was a chase by somebody after a dog. As one speaking 
high standard, "whom" sounds better.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/