ATEG Archives

September 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Caroline Chesebrough <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:55:18 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
	I would not use 'that'. I understand this is not the subject
under discussion, but the friend is a person, not an object so requires
a personal pronoun. One could say "...if he had someone he could play
with."

	Caroline

On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Johanna Rubba wrote:

>  "(1)The little child is lonely; he would be happier if he had someone that
> he can play with."
> 
> Do any of the native speakers on this list find this sentence
> grammatical? I can't imagine this being acceptable to anyone, but maybe
> I'm wrong. The 'that' clause requires 'could'.
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Johanna Rubba   Assistant Professor, Linguistics
> English Department, California Polytechnic State University
> One Grand Avenue  • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
> Tel. (805)-756-2184  •  Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone.  756-259
> • E-mail: [log in to unmask] •  Home page: http://www.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
>                                        **
> "Understanding is a lot like sex; it's got a practical purpose,
> but that's not why people do it normally"  -            Frank  Oppenheimer
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2