ATEG Archives

March 2005

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gregg Heacock <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:32:23 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I have been most entertained by Johanna Rubba's remarks on form vs. function and by the "go camping" discussion,
especially considering idiom.  Let me pose another question.  Consider the following sentences:

The husband and wife were at each other all night.
The young couple were at it all night.

It seems to me that the sentence exists as a whole.  Is the verb an extended verb:  were at?  Is that now functioning as
an action verb?  Isn't its form and function determined by the direct object?  Can syntax truly be separated from
semantics?  Lately, I have been reading up on cognitive grammar.  I suspect it has something to offer in this instance.

In any case, I thought you might like to have at it for a while.  I look forward to seeing how you approach this.

Sincerely,
Gregg Heacock

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2