Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Mar 1997 05:07:17 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 11:08 PM 3/17/97 +0000, Mike Medley wrote:
> Upon looking in my 1990 edition of the Oxford Concise Dictionary, I
> had to chuckle when I saw that for 12 of the 13 possible meanings listed
>for the verb 'hang,' the past and past participle is 'hung.' ONLY for 'sense
>number 7' ('suspend or be suspended by the neck with a noosed rope') is
>'hanged' to be used. Does 'hanged' have even half a chance of survival?
Mike,
I'm afraid you're right. Poor 'hanged' may soon be extinct. But what a sad
loss; just listen to the difference between the sound of 'hung' and the
sound of 'hanged' - do you agree that the latter is much more effective for
"sense number 7" than the former?
Just HUNGing around,
Paul E. Doniger
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|