ATEG Archives

March 1999

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Paul E. Doniger" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 23:50:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Reinhold Schlieper wrote:

> Bob, I don't think that's an aphorism.  Actually, it's an argument, and,
> as a petitio principii, a faulty one.  To assert existence, I suppose,
> some might say "I am."  But ordinarily that sounds empty of meaning.  I
> would expect that "I am a teacher" is a more sensible use of the copula.
> Crane didn't say either, "A man said to the universe, / Sir, I am."   He
> said, "Sir, I exist."  I think that "John is" sounds complete only if we
> are tainted by philosophical forethought, no?

I'm reminded of the Italian poet (I forgot who - if anyone can help me out
... ) who wrote of Napoleon: "Ei Fu." - "He was." - and of the line in
Boito's libretto for Verdi's _Otello_, "Ah, gloria, Otello fu!" Does the
intransitive "Be" work in Italian, but not English? Or is it only used as a
literary device and not in spoken language? I find this a fascinating
topic!

Paul D.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2