Let me second Martha's posting on scope and sequence. We do need more
classes and more precision than in the traditional grammar. But let me also
suggest that if we need new terminology, let's not be afraid to adopt it.
Someday someone has to begin a real reform, and I think that the time is
now. Otherwise, the profession will reach the next century (2100), and
someone will still be arguing that no changes can be made because of the
traditional training of English teachers won't allow it.

Also, let's begin pushing for a required course in grammar for anyone
intending to teach secondary English. There are still colleges that don't
have such a requirement.

And while we are thinking of scope and sequence, perhaps we should think
about the scope and sequence of college training in grammar. Probably there
should be TWO courses in grammar for teachers (and two courses in writing
for teachers as well).

Bill

William J. McCleary
3247 Bronson Hill Road
Livonia, NY 14487
716-346-6859