ATEG Archives

September 2007

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ronald Sheen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:56:21 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
Many thanks, Bruce.   Historical background always provides enlightenment.

So now then, does Sherlock induce or deduce?

Ron Sheen



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce D. Despain" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:04 AM
Subject: Re: Not so elementary, my dear Watson.Re: Inductive - Deductive:was 
New discussion intelligence and grammar learning


> Ron,
>
> This extract from my introduction to grammar on the role of hypothesis may 
> be helpful:
>
>      Induction.  The 17th Century philosopher, Francis Bacon, extended the 
> set of acceptable tools of rational thought when he pointed out how 
> investigators infer a scientific theory from the observed facts whenever 
> they generalize. Generalization is the logical process of induction from a 
> number of specific instances. Suppose scientists make the "same" 
> observation a number of times. After so many observations they feel they 
> are entitled to conclude (with some degree of certainty) that they are 
> observing the effects of some general principle. (This kind of induction 
> is distinct from what mathematicians know as induction. These people 
> define mathematical induction with statements about numbers that make it 
> for them in actuality an extension of deduction.) Bacon maintained that 
> support for facts could come by both deduction and induction.
>
>
>      Logical induction vs. deduction.  In the mid-18th Century David Hume, 
> clearly demonstrated the fact that Bacon's brand of logical induction 
> cannot strictly qualify as a mode of reasoning. In order to establish 
> induction on a basis as secure as deduction, philosophers are obliged to 
> accept the validity of the conclusion (the general principle) to the same 
> extent as the assumption. Only then would they be able to infer the 
> conclusion with the same certainty as the assumptions.
>
>
>      Inference.  Inference by induction is a way of connecting 
> experience - of making sense out of a collection of observations. The 
> general principle that the investigator induces is the result of numerous 
> confirmations of a hypothesis with failure to disconfirm it. It was Karl 
> Popper, who in modern times was responsible for the rejection of induction 
> as a mode of reasoning (Popper, 1972). Popper emphasized strongly that 
> induction is actually quite the equivalent of hypothesis and experiment.
>      Bruce
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ronald Sheen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:49 AM
> Subject: Not so elementary, my dear Watson.Re: Inductive - Deductive:was 
> New discussion intelligence and grammar learning
>
>
>> Johanna's example of Holmes deducing something or other illustrates how 
>> tricky the pair of words is.  On the one hand, he brings together a set 
>> of facts and induces therefrom a conclusion as in 'I see, my dear fellow, 
>> from your rough hands, your rasping cough, your wheezing and the coal 
>> dust in your eyes that you are a miner.'   On the other hand, stretching 
>> it a bit, I suppose one could say that Holmes has a set of rules of thumb 
>> such as 'rough hands come from manual work' and 'a rasping cough and 
>> wheezing' is a symptom of miners.   He then applies them to the facts 
>> before his eyes and ears and draws together the conclusions from which he 
>> induces...Then again, maybe he deduces...
>>
>> This is probably why in applied linguistics the terms 'implicit' and 
>> 'explicit' have replaced the troublesome pair.
>>
>> Ron Sheen
>> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web 
>> interface at:
>>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>> and select "Join or leave the list"
>>
>> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>>
>>
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface 
> at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ 

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2