Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:21:29 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think the problem is that the -est superlative ending is not
normally applied to adjectives (or participles) that have two or more
syllables, unless the adjective ends in -y, or, for some people, -ow.
Most two-syllable adjectives and participles form the superlative with
"most."
So it's
nice nicer nicest
pretty prettier prettiest
shallow [?] shallower [?] shallowest
but
common more common most common
charming more charming most charming
winning more winning most winning
Is that in any way a help?
Kathleen Ward
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Scott Lavitt wrote:
> Recently a high school boy used the word "winningest," as in "the
> winningest team," which just sounds wrong to me. It's listed as an
> informal word in Webster's. I was trying to think of a rule why this
> may not be SAE. First I thought perhaps the double suffix, -ing and -
> est, but I can think of examples where double suffixes are
> acceptable. I'm wondering if anyone can shed some light on the matter.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Scott
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
> interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and
> select "Join or leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|