ATEG Archives

March 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
DD Farms <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
At 04:25 PM 3/13/2008, Veit, Richard wrote:
>That fact that half of a group of educated speakers did not use the
>subjunctive to describe a hypothetical situation is more evidence
>suggesting that the subjunctive is disappearing from our language.

DD: I agree. Now consider that in the expression "If I were King, 
..." the probability hint is given in the preposition. The "were 
[Subjunctive use.]" is redundant. {Yes, redundancy is important.} If 
you say, "If I was King." the idea still comes across that you are 
not. "If I am King . . .". Gives a different slant. Sort of a , "Well 
then, now that I am, here is what I am going to do." Hmm. Note 
another item. If we move to the past, suggesting kingship probability 
or impossibility in the past, it becomes, colloquially, "If I'd of 
been King ...".  Is that really "of" ? Is it an understood by the 
speaker and listener to be slurred, "If I had have been King..."? {My 
mind blocks out the, "Iffen I dove been King . . ."} 

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2