ATEG Archives

November 1996

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Beason <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:37:30 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Burkhard,
You're quite right.  I spoke (emailed) too quickly when I said "supposed
to" might be a single morpheme.  It has at least a couple.  But I think the
concept of "quasi-modals" is a legitimate category even if--like all other
categories of grammar--not leak-proof.  A quasi-modal is (to take a stab at
an informal definition) a group of words, normally two, that function as a
auxillary verb.  Furthermore, the definition must hinge on this: the two
words semantically as well as grammatically work together & breaking them
apart would be counter-intuitive.  Sometimes, then, this name is applied by
default--when, as with the sentence in question here--there seems to be no
other way to analyze the sentence.
 
Larry Beason,Director
English Composition Program
Dept. of English
Eastern Washington University
Cheney WA 99004
[log in to unmask]
 
WAC Page: http://ewu66649.ewu.edu/WAC.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2