Karl,
I wonder about the participial adjective judgment, just because "to"
seems somewhat attached to it.
"I was pleased to meet you."
"I was pleased."
"I was supposed to meet you."
"I was supposed to."
*? "I was supposed."
I think one reason the phonology reduces is that "to" is not quite so
separate as an element.
I suspect that is partly what you mean by quasi modal? It's not just
supposed, but "be supposed to" that acts in that way?
Craig
Paul,
>
> I think you're right. Ultimately, this is a confusion based on normal
> phonological processes. Unless one is being extremely careful and
> over-articulating one's pronunciation, it's normal not to release the
> final /d/ of a past-tense verb when the following word is followed by
> another consonant with the same place of articulation (as is the case
> with /t/). So students simply don't hear the -ed at the end of the word
> and therefore reinterpret.
>
> BTW, although "supposed" may have originated as a passive, I wouldn't
> analyze it as a passive voice in present-day English. I think "supposed"
> is now a participial adjective, one that has developed a quasi-modal
> meaning quite distinct from a passive version of "suppose."
>
> Karl
>
> On 2/19/2011 4:53 PM, Paul E. Doniger wrote:
>> Is this the same error that I often see among my high school students
>> with "used to" being written, "use to?" E.g>, *"I was suppose to do my
>> homework on time." and *"I use to always do my homework on time." I
>> don't hear the second one as passive.
>> Paul
>> "If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
>> improbable fiction" (_Twelfth Night_ 3.4.127-128).
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Craig Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Sent:* Sat, February 19, 2011 6:51:42 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: Supposed versus Suppose
>>
>> Brian,
>> I think that is undoubtedly its source. Like any passive, the first
>> auxiliary (am, are,was, were) would carry the tense and "supposed"
>> would be past participle. But think about how awkward it sounds to
>> say "the government supposes me to pay my taxes." It's not so awkward
>> to say "the government requires me to pay me taxes" or "obligates me
>> to pay my taxes." The alternative possibility is that it has become a
>> three word construction that acts like a modal auxiliary. "I am
>> supposed to pay my taxes." "I should pay my taxes." "I must pay my
>> taxes."
>> A close parallel would be "am going to," which started out as meaning
>> movement toward a goal (I am going to the park), broadened out as an
>> expression of intention (I am going to vote in the next election), and
>> now can be used as modal predictor, as parallel to "will" ("It is going
>> to rain").
>> Other similar constructs would be "ought to" and "have to" and "be
>> able to."
>> This seems to me another good example of grammaticalization at work.
>> Words or phrases can change their function over time, and sometimes
>> they will seem to be part way there.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> > Isn't it passive voice? If "we are supposed to x," someone (or
>> everyone)
>> > supposes that we should and will x, but the identity of the supposer
>> isn't
>> > really relevant, so we leave it out by using passive voice (in which
>> case
>> > we use "-ed" even in the present tense).
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
>> > [[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on
>> behalf of Linda Comerford
>> > [[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 6:07 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> > Subject: Supposed versus Suppose
>> >
>> > Help!
>> >
>> > During an oral grammar workshop, somehow the class got into a
>> discussion
>> > about the difference between "supposed" and "suppose." The
>> participants
>> > didn't pronounce "supposed" with the "d" and had assumed the word was
>> > "suppose." We discussed how past tense verbs have the "ed" at the
>> end,
>> > whether we enunciate it or not, and thought that would suffice. It
>> didn't
>> > because someone pointed out that "we are supposed to" is an an
>> example of
>> > a present tense verb that still needed the "d" at the end. Okay, I
>> must
>> > admit that stumped me.
>> >
>> > Further confusion arose when someone contrasted "supposed" with
>> "suppose"
>> > like, "Do you suppose we will ever resolve these questions?" At that
>> > point, I wasn't sure we ever would and called a break hoping I could
>> find
>> > a dictionary to differentiate those words and how they worked. The
>> > dictionary was no help at all; the explanations were contradictory
>> instead
>> > of enlightening.
>> >
>> > Can any of you help me with this? I'd appreciate whatever you can
>> send
>> > either through the listserv or directly to me. Since I'm "supposed"
>> to
>> > follow up with the class, I "suppose" I should have a clear
>> explanation
>> > for the class. Thanks so much.
>> >
>> > Linda
>> >
>> >
>> > Linda Comerford
>> > 317.786.6404
>> > [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> >
>> www.comerfordconsulting.com<https://webmail.smcm.edu/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> On Behalf Of STAHLKE, HERBERT F
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 10:55 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> > Subject: "thats" for "whose"
>> >
>> > We’ve had considerable discussion of relative “that” from time
>> to time,
>> > and I thought the following exchange from ADS-L might be of interest.
>> >
>> > Herbert F. W. Stahlke, Ph.D.
>> > Emeritus Professor of English
>> > Ball State University
>> > Muncie, IN 47306
>> > [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> >
>> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
>> > -----------------------
>> > Sender: American Dialect Society
>> > <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>
>> > Poster: Jonathan Lighter
>> > <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>
>> > Subject: Re: "I've a 24" 2.4Ghz iMac _that's_ hard drive recently
>> > packed
>> > in."
>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > I mentioned this some years ago. I had a freshman in the early '80s
>> who
>> > insisted that "that's" was correct because "whose" referred to
>> people.
>> >
>> > When I surveyed English Department graduate students with a
>> > fill-in-the-blank quiz, a fair number filled in the blanks with
>> "that's"
>> > instead of "whose."
>> >
>> > God knows what they wrote in their own papers. They were mainly
>> working on
>> > masters' rather than doctoral degrees, if that makes anyone feel
>> better.
>> > And
>> > did I mention that the degrees would be in English? Yeah, I guess I
>> did.
>> >
>> > JL
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Laurence Horn
>> >> <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > it's an instance of "that" (reanalyzed from complementizer to
>> >> > relative pronoun) in the genitive, as noted.
>> >> >
>> >
>> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>> interface
>> > at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or
>> > leave the list"
>> >
>> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>> >
>> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>> interface
>> > at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or
>> > leave the list"
>> >
>> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>> >
>> > To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>> interface
>> > at:
>> > http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>> > and select "Join or leave the list"
>> >
>> > Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>> >
>>
>> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>> interface at:
>> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>> and select "Join or leave the list"
>>
>> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
>> interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select
>> "Join or leave the list"
>>
>> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>>
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
> at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
