ATEG Archives

September 2006

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Hancock <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:37:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Phil,
   I agree, but I think we need to make it clear that our agreement is
essentially that we will use these terms to mean these things, and that
the distinctions are important.
   I think the semi-colon is a natural tool to show a simultaneous
connection and independence between clauses, like those in your
"however" example. (I'm just as glad you didn't use the semi-colon;
some grammar books talk as though it is the right way to do it.) And I
have no problem with starting with the role of the semi-colon and then
coming up with examples that seem effective.
  In an effective text, no sentences function independently of each other.
From there, we can see lots of ways in which the connections are built
and made manifest.
  These are important problems precisely because they are at the
conjunction of syntax and discourse. If sentences are to do the work of
discourse, then we need to look at how.
  Following most handbooks won't get us very far.

Craig


   Their independence is what determines that they are adverbs and not
> conjunctions.  A conjunction requires two clauses an adverb can sit
> with john.   John dates Mary although she is leaving town.
> Subordinate conjunction   John likes Mary but she is leaving town.
>                  Coordinate conjunction   John likes Mary.  However,
> she is leaving town.           Conjunctive adverb   This is not just a
> punctuation convention but a recognition of the fundamental difference
> between an adverb that carries this sort of meaning (consequence,
> negative consequenec, conjunction, etc) and the conjunctions that do.
>   Phil Bralich
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Adams
> Sent: Sep 10, 2006 2:08 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Conjunctive Adverbs
>
> Everyone seems to agree, even Martha Kolln and the Cambridge Grammar, that
> conjunctive adverbs are, indeed, conjunctions.  I still don't see why they
> are not just considered adverbs.  Does anyone see it my way?
>
>
>
> Peter Adams
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
> at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or
> leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV
> list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave
> the list"
>  Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2