Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 1996 01:45:00 -0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> What exactly are we defining as a solo here?
The intro in "Voodoo Chile" with Jimi Hendrix, for example. I guess there's a
thousands of definitions on what a solo "is". But what I had in mind was the
Hendrix style.
> If the criteria we are using is that any REAL solo has to be
> REALLY long, the point is stupid.
Absolutely.
*cut*
> If anyone has any doubt about musicianship within the Connells, let me
> share my opinions about the band:
No one has expressed any doubt about their musicianship. If I didn't think they
were the best I wouldn't buy all their albums.
*cut*
> So what's my point after all that - the Connells are not a jam oriented
> band, so don't expect long solos. At the same time, don't insult their
> music and plying ability by saying they don't do solos, open your ears
> and listen for them - you know, those guitar lines usually over the cool
> chord changes in the bridge...
I don't think I've insulted them by asking for solos ? la Hendrix, or? It would
be fun to hear what the band has to say. Any reason is good. Still, it would be
fun to know how a Connells solo would sound like... ;)
.jbn.
|
|
|