So as we start to engage the wider MU community on the migration, I
wonder: have we settled on a story and plan for the future evolution
of Sakai at MU?

More specifically, have we figured out how we will deal with the
migration to Sakai 3, and how we explain it?

It seem to me this question has bearing on a whole lot of details,
from the technical implementation and development process, to the
governance process (if a governance body prioritizes new features,
which platform(s) do they target?), to building up support for the
migration in general.

Do we:

a) just not talk about that now (this has been my impulse in talking
to people new to this)?
b) say we're planning a gradual migration that includes the hybrid
mode as soon as it's ready, perhaps coupled with a pilot at some point
next year?
c) something else?

Not rhetorical questions; still not sure this list isn't some virtual
black hole!
-- 
Bruce D'Arcus
Associate Professor, Graduate Director
Department of Geography
Miami University
234 Shideler Hall
Oxford, Ohio 45056