OHIOFIRE Archives

June 2000

OHIOFIRE@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Wadleigh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Association of Campus Fire Safety Officials <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:12:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
We have had the following situation in our new engineering building labs. Our state's building code
BOCA international, required "ducts" to be sprinklered the same as the rest of the building. This provision was enforced by  TAHJ.  To meet this, we added an BC suppression system, much like a cooking dry chemical suppression system, which satisfied TAHJ.  When the acceptance inspector arrived, there were two jars of metals in storage adjacent to the hood, when I asked him if they reacted in the hood, what effect would the suppression system have on them, he said (correctly) not too much if any.

We petitioned and won an exemption for suppression in hoods and fume hood ducts based on computer modeling and info from MSDSs on the materials most likely to be used in the lab.

We are continuing to sprinklering all labs along with the entire building in all new construction
and considering Class D portable extinguishers
for those few areas with a metal problem.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2