I find it interesting that people are questioning Churchill's
identity.  That has nothing to do with the validity of his arguments, but
rather is a ploy to attack his credibility.  Validity should always be one
of the tests of any piece of work.  If ethnicity matters, then we should
demand that of every scientific piece:  what is the authors
ethnicity?  What nonsense! At 09:33 AM 2/8/05, Tom Dutton wrote:
>The column by Bronson is out today.
>
>>Tom,
>>
>>Ward Churchill is a very complex individual.    I heard that
>>conservative Cincinnati talk radio was critical of Miami University for
>>bringing in Churchill.    I haven't seen any Cincinnati Enquirer
>>editorial;  but if none yet, then could be one tomorrow (Sunday).
>>
>>For quite a bit of information about Native news in general see.
>>     indianz.com
>>  Interesting article questions Churchill's tribal membership status.
>>?????
>>
>>Joe
>>
>>>>>  [log in to unmask] 02/05/05 2:11 PM >>>
>>Joe I would love to meet with you if you'd like (and anyone else who
>>is trying to make sense of the events of this past week).
>>
>>Tom Dutton
>>9-6445
>
>George S. Esber, Ph.D.
>Miami University
>4200 East University Blvd
>Middletown, Ohio 45042
>(513) 727-3282
>[log in to unmask]